<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1134 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175008</link>
    <description>The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 302 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment and a fine. The sole eyewitness&#039;s testimony was deemed reliable, supported by medical evidence and corroborating witnesses. Despite minor contradictions in the witness statements, the court found the core account credible. The motive for the crime and the accused&#039;s post-crime conduct further strengthened the prosecution&#039;s case. Even though no charge under Section 34 IPC was framed, the court concluded that the evidence demonstrated common intention. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the conviction under Section 302 IPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1134 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175008</link>
      <description>The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 302 IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment and a fine. The sole eyewitness&#039;s testimony was deemed reliable, supported by medical evidence and corroborating witnesses. Despite minor contradictions in the witness statements, the court found the core account credible. The motive for the crime and the accused&#039;s post-crime conduct further strengthened the prosecution&#039;s case. Even though no charge under Section 34 IPC was framed, the court concluded that the evidence demonstrated common intention. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the conviction under Section 302 IPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>