<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 488 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175007</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the High Court&#039;s requirement for disclosure of specific witness identities in externment proceedings. The Court upheld the general nature of the allegations in the show cause notice, emphasizing witness protection. As the externment period had expired, the High Court&#039;s order was not given effect. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 488 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175007</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the High Court&#039;s requirement for disclosure of specific witness identities in externment proceedings. The Court upheld the general nature of the allegations in the show cause notice, emphasizing witness protection. As the externment period had expired, the High Court&#039;s order was not given effect. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>