https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175002 SC held the Division Bench of the HC erred in entertaining writ petitions challenging a State Commission order when the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 19, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was available. Emphasizing the Act's scheme to provide simple, speedy remedies through consumer fora and the jurisdictional limits in Sections 11, 17 and 21, the SC directed that the petitioners should pursue the appellate remedy rather than relief under Articles 226/227. The appeal was allowed and the impugned HC order was set aside. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175002 SC held the Division Bench of the HC erred in entertaining writ petitions challenging a State Commission order when the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 19, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was available. Emphasizing the Act's scheme to provide simple, speedy remedies through consumer fora and the jurisdictional limits in Sections 11, 17 and 21, the SC directed that the petitioners should pursue the appellate remedy rather than relief under Articles 226/227. The appeal was allowed and the impugned HC order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175002