https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994 Availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ relief under Article 226 where liability is admitted and no disputed question of fact survives. In such circumstances, the High Court should not compel the petitioner to pursue the alternative forum, because the writ court can grant relief directly on the admitted facts. The direction to approach the Railway Claims Tribunal was therefore unwarranted, and the dismissal of the writ petition was set aside. The respondents were directed to pay the admitted amount with interest. en-us Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994 Availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ relief under Article 226 where liability is admitted and no disputed question of fact survives. In such circumstances, the High Court should not compel the petitioner to pursue the alternative forum, because the writ court can grant relief directly on the admitted facts. The direction to approach the Railway Claims Tribunal was therefore unwarranted, and the dismissal of the writ petition was set aside. The respondents were directed to pay the admitted amount with interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994