https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994 The Supreme Court held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar for relief under Article 226 when the respondent admits liability. The High Court erred in dismissing the writ petition solely on this ground. The Court directed the respondents to pay the admitted liability with interest to the appellant within three months. en-us Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994 The Supreme Court held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar for relief under Article 226 when the respondent admits liability. The High Court erred in dismissing the writ petition solely on this ground. The Court directed the respondents to pay the admitted liability with interest to the appellant within three months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174994