<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174993</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and allowed the appeals by the employees. The Court held that transferring employees from NTPC to BALCO without consent was unjustified. It found clauses in the agreement discriminatory and unenforceable, ordering the employees to remain at NTPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174993</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and allowed the appeals by the employees. The Court held that transferring employees from NTPC to BALCO without consent was unjustified. It found clauses in the agreement discriminatory and unenforceable, ordering the employees to remain at NTPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>