<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 943 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174989</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the amendment to the recognition certificate under U.P. Trade Tax, excluding LDO/HSD fuel from concessional rate purchase list. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue the statutory remedy of filing an appeal, as directed by the Supreme Court in a previous case. The writ petition was dismissed due to the availability of an alternative remedy, but the Court directed the appeal, if filed within four weeks, to be expedited for decision on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:20:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 943 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174989</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the amendment to the recognition certificate under U.P. Trade Tax, excluding LDO/HSD fuel from concessional rate purchase list. The Court held that the petitioner should pursue the statutory remedy of filing an appeal, as directed by the Supreme Court in a previous case. The writ petition was dismissed due to the availability of an alternative remedy, but the Court directed the appeal, if filed within four weeks, to be expedited for decision on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>