<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174986</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the order of the Additional Collector demanding additional stamp duty, interest, and penalty. The Court emphasized the significance of considering the nature and use of the property at the time of purchase for stamp duty calculation and stressed the importance of providing parties with adequate opportunity before passing orders in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174986</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the order of the Additional Collector demanding additional stamp duty, interest, and penalty. The Court emphasized the significance of considering the nature and use of the property at the time of purchase for stamp duty calculation and stressed the importance of providing parties with adequate opportunity before passing orders in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>