https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174985 Article 226 allows the High Court to entertain a writ petition even where facts are disputed, if a civil suit would not provide an adequate or efficacious remedy and timely relief is needed. A no-confidence motion under the Gujarat Municipalities Act is valid when supported by the prescribed two-thirds majority of councillors; no specific ground, charge, or councillors' signatures are legally required once the motion is moved. The Collector's inquiry and order were vulnerable because interested persons were not heard, and that breach of natural justice was sufficient to invalidate the order. The combined position is that writ relief remained available, the motion stood validly carried, and the procedural defect in the Collector's process did not affect the result. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 13:08:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174985 Article 226 allows the High Court to entertain a writ petition even where facts are disputed, if a civil suit would not provide an adequate or efficacious remedy and timely relief is needed. A no-confidence motion under the Gujarat Municipalities Act is valid when supported by the prescribed two-thirds majority of councillors; no specific ground, charge, or councillors' signatures are legally required once the motion is moved. The Collector's inquiry and order were vulnerable because interested persons were not heard, and that breach of natural justice was sufficient to invalidate the order. The combined position is that writ relief remained available, the motion stood validly carried, and the procedural defect in the Collector's process did not affect the result. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174985