<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 644 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174984</link>
    <description>Special leave petitions in a central excise dispute were dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving the lower court outcome undisturbed. The order records no substantive legal reasoning and provides no further clarification on the excise issue beyond dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 13:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 644 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174984</link>
      <description>Special leave petitions in a central excise dispute were dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving the lower court outcome undisturbed. The order records no substantive legal reasoning and provides no further clarification on the excise issue beyond dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>