<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 758 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders canceling the penalties u/s 271D and 271E. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were in the nature of current accounts, not loans or deposits, and there was no tax evasion, thus the penalties were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 758 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders canceling the penalties u/s 271D and 271E. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were in the nature of current accounts, not loans or deposits, and there was no tax evasion, thus the penalties were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>