<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1222 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174978</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case to the tribunal to determine if the duty burden was passed on to the consumer. The appellant needs to demonstrate that the burden was not transferred to receive a refund. The tribunal has the discretion to refer the case back to the Assistant Collector for additional review. The appeal was granted without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:04:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1222 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174978</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case to the tribunal to determine if the duty burden was passed on to the consumer. The appellant needs to demonstrate that the burden was not transferred to receive a refund. The tribunal has the discretion to refer the case back to the Assistant Collector for additional review. The appeal was granted without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>