<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 644 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174976</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Visitor&#039;s decision to annul the appellant&#039;s appointment due to ineligibility and non-compliance with statutory requirements. The Court upheld the principles of eligibility determination, the Visitor&#039;s statutory powers, and the necessity of adhering to legal standards over equity and sympathy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 644 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174976</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Visitor&#039;s decision to annul the appellant&#039;s appointment due to ineligibility and non-compliance with statutory requirements. The Court upheld the principles of eligibility determination, the Visitor&#039;s statutory powers, and the necessity of adhering to legal standards over equity and sympathy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>