https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267246 The tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant constituted advertising services rather than business auxiliary services. The appellant was held liable for service tax on these services from 1/4/2000 to 30/6/2003. The extended period for demand was deemed justified due to the suppression of facts, leading to penalties under Sections 76 and 78 being upheld. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the order-in-original. en-us Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267246 The tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant constituted advertising services rather than business auxiliary services. The appellant was held liable for service tax on these services from 1/4/2000 to 30/6/2003. The extended period for demand was deemed justified due to the suppression of facts, leading to penalties under Sections 76 and 78 being upheld. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the order-in-original. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267246