<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 51 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267242</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, except for the penalty imposition for contravention of provisions. The demand for service tax of Rs. 5.88 crores and CENVAT credit demands of Rs. 7.54 crores, Rs. 6,60,545, and Rs. 8,82,646 were not sustained. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments valid regarding the tax liabilities and admissibility of credits. No penalty was imposed due to the transitional phase of new provisions. The order was pronounced on 01/06/2015, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 51 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267242</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, except for the penalty imposition for contravention of provisions. The demand for service tax of Rs. 5.88 crores and CENVAT credit demands of Rs. 7.54 crores, Rs. 6,60,545, and Rs. 8,82,646 were not sustained. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments valid regarding the tax liabilities and admissibility of credits. No penalty was imposed due to the transitional phase of new provisions. The order was pronounced on 01/06/2015, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>