<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 45 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267236</link>
    <description>The appellant was found ineligible for CENVAT Credit at the Jajpur Plant for inputs, capital goods, and input services used at the Barbil Plant. Unified registration for both plants was not allowed. However, CENVAT Credit was deemed admissible for input services used in transporting iron ore concentrate from Barbil to Jajpur. A new plea regarding CENVAT Credit eligibility at the Barbil Plant post-2013 requires verification by the department. No penalty was imposed, pending verification of the new plea, and the applicability of interest will be determined accordingly. The impugned order was modified, and the appeal was disposed of based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 45 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267236</link>
      <description>The appellant was found ineligible for CENVAT Credit at the Jajpur Plant for inputs, capital goods, and input services used at the Barbil Plant. Unified registration for both plants was not allowed. However, CENVAT Credit was deemed admissible for input services used in transporting iron ore concentrate from Barbil to Jajpur. A new plea regarding CENVAT Credit eligibility at the Barbil Plant post-2013 requires verification by the department. No penalty was imposed, pending verification of the new plea, and the applicability of interest will be determined accordingly. The impugned order was modified, and the appeal was disposed of based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>