<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 44 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that the appellant, acting as a trader, was not entitled to MODVAT credit for bought-out items exported without being used in manufacturing. It dismissed the plea regarding the time-bar aspect and clarified that penalties could only be imposed post-23.6.1996. The appellant&#039;s rebate entitlement was denied due to its role as a merchant exporter. The Tribunal directed verification and segregation of input and capital goods records and instructed re-examination of overlapping demands in re-adjudicated orders. The matter was remanded for detailed re-adjudication, emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and fair treatment of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 44 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that the appellant, acting as a trader, was not entitled to MODVAT credit for bought-out items exported without being used in manufacturing. It dismissed the plea regarding the time-bar aspect and clarified that penalties could only be imposed post-23.6.1996. The appellant&#039;s rebate entitlement was denied due to its role as a merchant exporter. The Tribunal directed verification and segregation of input and capital goods records and instructed re-examination of overlapping demands in re-adjudicated orders. The matter was remanded for detailed re-adjudication, emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and fair treatment of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>