<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant correctly paid duty on the final product at Rs. 1 per kg, availed Cenvat Credit, and did not engage in processes specified for exemption under the notification. As a result, the provisions of section 11D were deemed inapplicable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequent relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant correctly paid duty on the final product at Rs. 1 per kg, availed Cenvat Credit, and did not engage in processes specified for exemption under the notification. As a result, the provisions of section 11D were deemed inapplicable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequent relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>