https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267232 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the application for permission to remove goods for further processing under Rule 16C for the financial year 2015-16. The Tribunal found the denial of permission not legally sustainable, considering the appellant's compliance in previous years. The Commissioner was directed to grant permission to the appellant, highlighting the significance of adhering to legal procedures and exercising administrative discretion judiciously for the benefit of the assessee and trade. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:51:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267232 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the application for permission to remove goods for further processing under Rule 16C for the financial year 2015-16. The Tribunal found the denial of permission not legally sustainable, considering the appellant's compliance in previous years. The Commissioner was directed to grant permission to the appellant, highlighting the significance of adhering to legal procedures and exercising administrative discretion judiciously for the benefit of the assessee and trade. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267232