https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267230 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's appeal against the rejection of a refund under OIA No. KRS/199/Vapi/2008. The appellant's attempt to avail benefits under a different notification after paying duty under another was deemed impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to specific procedures outlined in relevant notifications and limitations on seeking refunds under different provisions of the Central Excise Act. The first appellate authority's decision was upheld, and the appellant's appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267230 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's appeal against the rejection of a refund under OIA No. KRS/199/Vapi/2008. The appellant's attempt to avail benefits under a different notification after paying duty under another was deemed impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to specific procedures outlined in relevant notifications and limitations on seeking refunds under different provisions of the Central Excise Act. The first appellate authority's decision was upheld, and the appellant's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267230