<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 36 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267227</link>
    <description>Steel items used to fabricate and install components and accessories of capital goods in a sugar factory were treated as eligible Cenvat credit inputs where they formed part of machinery such as cane carriers, juice clarifiers, evaporators, pan stations, molasses tanks and boiler-related structures used in manufacture. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on cases involving embedded supporting structures and immovable assets was distinguished on facts, and circulars treating structural components used as part of boiler systems as boiler parts supported the claim. The items were therefore not characterised as mere civil or immovable structures, and credit was allowed without reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 36 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267227</link>
      <description>Steel items used to fabricate and install components and accessories of capital goods in a sugar factory were treated as eligible Cenvat credit inputs where they formed part of machinery such as cane carriers, juice clarifiers, evaporators, pan stations, molasses tanks and boiler-related structures used in manufacture. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on cases involving embedded supporting structures and immovable assets was distinguished on facts, and circulars treating structural components used as part of boiler systems as boiler parts supported the claim. The items were therefore not characterised as mere civil or immovable structures, and credit was allowed without reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>