https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267218 The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration as a valuer under the Wealth Tax Act, emphasizing the specific qualifications needed for such roles. Despite possessing a Bachelor of Engineering degree, the petitioner's qualifications did not meet the necessary criteria for valuing immovable properties, machinery, and plant. The court ruled that the petitioner's engineering background was not equivalent to the qualifications required for registration, ultimately dismissing the writ petition challenging the rejection of the application. en-us Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267218 The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration as a valuer under the Wealth Tax Act, emphasizing the specific qualifications needed for such roles. Despite possessing a Bachelor of Engineering degree, the petitioner's qualifications did not meet the necessary criteria for valuing immovable properties, machinery, and plant. The court ruled that the petitioner's engineering background was not equivalent to the qualifications required for registration, ultimately dismissing the writ petition challenging the rejection of the application. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267218