<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267216</link>
    <description>A civil suit seeking recovery of interest on amounts deposited with the Income Tax Department was treated as barred by Section 293 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 because the claim would indirectly interfere with the consequences of proceedings and orders under the Act. The court noted that a recovery claim tied to computation and refund determined in a settlement order should have been pursued within the statutory framework or by challenge in the proper forum. Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure could not confer jurisdiction where the Act itself imposed an express bar. The civil court therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267216</link>
      <description>A civil suit seeking recovery of interest on amounts deposited with the Income Tax Department was treated as barred by Section 293 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 because the claim would indirectly interfere with the consequences of proceedings and orders under the Act. The court noted that a recovery claim tied to computation and refund determined in a settlement order should have been pursued within the statutory framework or by challenge in the proper forum. Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure could not confer jurisdiction where the Act itself imposed an express bar. The civil court therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>