<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, an Indian company, in the assessment year 2006-07. It allowed the appeal, deleting significant disallowances and adjustments made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and upheld by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The disallowance of 50% out of the purchase value paid for machinery from the associated enterprise was overturned due to lack of proper valuation basis. The disallowance of amounts paid towards cost-sharing arrangement and IT support was also reversed as the TPO failed to determine the arm&#039;s length price correctly. Additionally, the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill and the enhancement of the value of closing stock of raw material were both deleted in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, an Indian company, in the assessment year 2006-07. It allowed the appeal, deleting significant disallowances and adjustments made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and upheld by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The disallowance of 50% out of the purchase value paid for machinery from the associated enterprise was overturned due to lack of proper valuation basis. The disallowance of amounts paid towards cost-sharing arrangement and IT support was also reversed as the TPO failed to determine the arm&#039;s length price correctly. Additionally, the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill and the enhancement of the value of closing stock of raw material were both deleted in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>