<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 59 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=956</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, overturned the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to recover DEPB credit due to alleged misdeclaration of goods description. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporters, citing legal precedents that Customs Authorities cannot question the validity of DEPB licenses once issued by the DGFT. The judgment emphasized adherence to established procedures and set aside the order for DEPB credit recovery, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 59 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=956</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, overturned the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to recover DEPB credit due to alleged misdeclaration of goods description. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporters, citing legal precedents that Customs Authorities cannot question the validity of DEPB licenses once issued by the DGFT. The judgment emphasized adherence to established procedures and set aside the order for DEPB credit recovery, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>