https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174974 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings occurs when the chargesheet is framed and despatched, not necessarily when served. The Court clarified that the sealed cover procedure applies once the decision to initiate proceedings is made, irrespective of the timing of serving the chargesheet. As a result, the respondent's writ petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:16:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174974 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings occurs when the chargesheet is framed and despatched, not necessarily when served. The Court clarified that the sealed cover procedure applies once the decision to initiate proceedings is made, irrespective of the timing of serving the chargesheet. As a result, the respondent's writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174974