<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 19 -  CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=954</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants. The judgment clarified that the cost of tools/dies at the hand of the buyer should be the basis for determining the assessable value of parts and components, without adding the notional margin of profit of the buyer for amortization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 19 -  CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=954</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants. The judgment clarified that the cost of tools/dies at the hand of the buyer should be the basis for determining the assessable value of parts and components, without adding the notional margin of profit of the buyer for amortization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>