https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174969 The Supreme Court held that the awards made by the two members of the Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) during the absence of the third member were void as the Tribunal could not function with only two members without a fresh notification under section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, the final award signed by all three members after the absent member rejoined was upheld as valid. The Court emphasized the importance of a properly constituted Tribunal for making valid awards under the Act. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:51:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174969 The Supreme Court held that the awards made by the two members of the Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) during the absence of the third member were void as the Tribunal could not function with only two members without a fresh notification under section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, the final award signed by all three members after the absent member rejoined was upheld as valid. The Court emphasized the importance of a properly constituted Tribunal for making valid awards under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174969