<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1315 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174965</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand, interest, and penalty was denied. The duty demand was confirmed based on alleged misuse of SSI exemption and ownership of the brand name RIAT, which the appellant failed to prove. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set period, failing which the pre-deposit requirement would stand, and recovery would proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1315 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174965</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand, interest, and penalty was denied. The duty demand was confirmed based on alleged misuse of SSI exemption and ownership of the brand name RIAT, which the appellant failed to prove. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set period, failing which the pre-deposit requirement would stand, and recovery would proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>