<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174960</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to confirm the demand of duty and penalty. It also supported the confiscation of diamonds and imposition of a redemption fine. The Court found 63,078.35 carats of diamonds liable for confiscation. Interim relief was granted to the appellants, requiring them to deposit Rs. 2 crores and provide security. The diamonds valued at Rs. 4.3 crores were to remain with the respondents as security until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. Additionally, a bond for a building was to be furnished in favor of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174960</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to confirm the demand of duty and penalty. It also supported the confiscation of diamonds and imposition of a redemption fine. The Court found 63,078.35 carats of diamonds liable for confiscation. Interim relief was granted to the appellants, requiring them to deposit Rs. 2 crores and provide security. The diamonds valued at Rs. 4.3 crores were to remain with the respondents as security until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. Additionally, a bond for a building was to be furnished in favor of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>