<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 92 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174959</link>
    <description>A company&#039;s purchase and resale of shares to obtain a dividend and tax repayment was examined by reference to the objective character of the transaction, not its fiscal motive alone. The analysis states that an absence of intention to earn an ordinary trading profit does not prevent a transaction from being trading if, viewed as actually carried out, it bears the essential features of a commercial share-dealing adventure. Tax recovery was treated as a possible consequence of such an operation, not as the defining activity. On that basis, the share transaction was regarded as an adventure in the nature of trade, and the loss claim was allowable in principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 92 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174959</link>
      <description>A company&#039;s purchase and resale of shares to obtain a dividend and tax repayment was examined by reference to the objective character of the transaction, not its fiscal motive alone. The analysis states that an absence of intention to earn an ordinary trading profit does not prevent a transaction from being trading if, viewed as actually carried out, it bears the essential features of a commercial share-dealing adventure. Tax recovery was treated as a possible consequence of such an operation, not as the defining activity. On that basis, the share transaction was regarded as an adventure in the nature of trade, and the loss claim was allowable in principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>