https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267188 The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur-II, upholding a tax demand of Rs. 4,43,109/- for providing Cargo Handling Service. The appellant's appeal was rejected, while the Revenue's appeal was partially allowed to increase the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal directed the appellant to remit the assessed tax liability along with interest within four weeks, failing which the stay of proceedings would be rescinded and the appeal dismissed for non-compliance. Compliance reporting was required by a specific date to maintain the stay of proceedings. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:44:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267188 The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur-II, upholding a tax demand of Rs. 4,43,109/- for providing Cargo Handling Service. The appellant's appeal was rejected, while the Revenue's appeal was partially allowed to increase the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal directed the appellant to remit the assessed tax liability along with interest within four weeks, failing which the stay of proceedings would be rescinded and the appeal dismissed for non-compliance. Compliance reporting was required by a specific date to maintain the stay of proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267188