<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2460 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim. The appellant&#039;s services were deemed eligible for refund under Business Auxiliary Services, not Business Support Services as initially classified. The Tribunal considered the CBEC Circular, legal interpretations, and precedents, finding the misclassification unjustified. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2460 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim. The appellant&#039;s services were deemed eligible for refund under Business Auxiliary Services, not Business Support Services as initially classified. The Tribunal considered the CBEC Circular, legal interpretations, and precedents, finding the misclassification unjustified. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>