<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267184</link>
    <description>The court set aside the attachment order as the Petitioners were unaware of the Sales Tax Authorities&#039; charge before purchasing the property. The Sales Tax Authorities were instructed to pursue their claim against Iccon Oil through the Official Liquidator. The court granted the Writ Petition in favor of the Petitioners, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267184</link>
      <description>The court set aside the attachment order as the Petitioners were unaware of the Sales Tax Authorities&#039; charge before purchasing the property. The Sales Tax Authorities were instructed to pursue their claim against Iccon Oil through the Official Liquidator. The court granted the Writ Petition in favor of the Petitioners, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>