<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267176</link>
    <description>Validly taken Cenvat credit on inputs, work-in-progress and finished goods could not be reversed merely because exemption was claimed for PSC pipes used in a project of national importance. The exemption notification contained no value-based or quantity-based condition triggering reversal, and the governing credit provisions were held inapplicable on the facts. In the absence of an express statutory requirement or a legally sustainable basis, and without a demonstrated one-to-one correlation justifying denial, the demand for reversal was held unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 09:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267176</link>
      <description>Validly taken Cenvat credit on inputs, work-in-progress and finished goods could not be reversed merely because exemption was claimed for PSC pipes used in a project of national importance. The exemption notification contained no value-based or quantity-based condition triggering reversal, and the governing credit provisions were held inapplicable on the facts. In the absence of an express statutory requirement or a legally sustainable basis, and without a demonstrated one-to-one correlation justifying denial, the demand for reversal was held unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>