<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2444 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267170</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of 239.970 MT of rice valued at &amp;amp;8377;73,36,098 under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to attempted export of non-basmati rice in violation of regulations. A redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377;30,00,000 and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;15,00,000 were imposed, which the tribunal deemed reasonable considering the gravity of the offense and quantity of goods involved. The appellant&#039;s defenses of being misled by suppliers and seeking leniency based on precedents were rejected, affirming the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:43:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2444 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267170</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of 239.970 MT of rice valued at &amp;amp;8377;73,36,098 under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to attempted export of non-basmati rice in violation of regulations. A redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377;30,00,000 and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;15,00,000 were imposed, which the tribunal deemed reasonable considering the gravity of the offense and quantity of goods involved. The appellant&#039;s defenses of being misled by suppliers and seeking leniency based on precedents were rejected, affirming the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>