<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to mis-declaration and submission of a fake country of origin certificate. The redemption fine of Rs. 5 lakhs was maintained as no market inquiry details were provided. However, the penalty was reduced from Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 as it was considered excessive compared to the duty evaded. The appeal was dismissed except for the penalty modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to mis-declaration and submission of a fake country of origin certificate. The redemption fine of Rs. 5 lakhs was maintained as no market inquiry details were provided. However, the penalty was reduced from Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 as it was considered excessive compared to the duty evaded. The appeal was dismissed except for the penalty modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>