<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2420 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267146</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee, a partnership firm, was partly allowed in a case where the Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the books of account due to unverifiable purchases. The AO made an addition of Rs. 3,57,741, which was upheld by the ld. CIT(A). However, the Coordinate Bench restricted the addition to 15% of the unverifiable purchases, citing legal precedents and decisions in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2420 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267146</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee, a partnership firm, was partly allowed in a case where the Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the books of account due to unverifiable purchases. The AO made an addition of Rs. 3,57,741, which was upheld by the ld. CIT(A). However, the Coordinate Bench restricted the addition to 15% of the unverifiable purchases, citing legal precedents and decisions in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>