<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT -DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=943</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging various customs duty issues, including the inclusion of countervailing duty (CVD) in &#039;customs duty&#039;, landing charges in assessable value, constitutionality of Section 3(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, rate of CVD on imported caprolactum, validity of increasing customs duty on caprolactum, and the 1982 Amendment Act. The court upheld the inclusion of landing charges, the application of CVD to counterbalance excise duty, and the validity of the customs duty increase notification. The petitioners&#039; arguments were deemed without merit, and the petition was dismissed with costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT -DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=943</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging various customs duty issues, including the inclusion of countervailing duty (CVD) in &#039;customs duty&#039;, landing charges in assessable value, constitutionality of Section 3(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, rate of CVD on imported caprolactum, validity of increasing customs duty on caprolactum, and the 1982 Amendment Act. The court upheld the inclusion of landing charges, the application of CVD to counterbalance excise duty, and the validity of the customs duty increase notification. The petitioners&#039; arguments were deemed without merit, and the petition was dismissed with costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>