<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Claim Rejected for EOU u/r 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules; Case Remanded for Further Examination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25623</link>
    <description>Rejection of Refund Claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 – 100% EOU – Commissioner (Appeals) did not examine all contracts in order to decide whether the activity is of &quot;maintenance or repair&quot; and has to quantify separately the amount involved relating to maintenance and repair service as also other service - matter remanded back - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Claim Rejected for EOU u/r 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules; Case Remanded for Further Examination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25623</link>
      <description>Rejection of Refund Claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 – 100% EOU – Commissioner (Appeals) did not examine all contracts in order to decide whether the activity is of &quot;maintenance or repair&quot; and has to quantify separately the amount involved relating to maintenance and repair service as also other service - matter remanded back - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>