<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2415 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267141</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the appeals being filed significantly beyond the condonable delay period. The court emphasized that statutory authorities cannot condone delays beyond the prescribed period, citing relevant case law. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to benefit from Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act was deemed inapplicable as the writ petition was filed post-expiry of the limitation period. The court clarified that filing a writ petition does not extend the statutory limitation period for appeals, cautioning against bypassing statutory procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 06:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2415 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267141</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the appeals being filed significantly beyond the condonable delay period. The court emphasized that statutory authorities cannot condone delays beyond the prescribed period, citing relevant case law. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to benefit from Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act was deemed inapplicable as the writ petition was filed post-expiry of the limitation period. The court clarified that filing a writ petition does not extend the statutory limitation period for appeals, cautioning against bypassing statutory procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>