<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2411 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt of payment in Indian Rupees through a foreign bank qualifies as convertible foreign exchange. It also deemed the Cenvat credit on the disputed input services admissible and found the classification dispute unwarranted. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 06:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2411 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt of payment in Indian Rupees through a foreign bank qualifies as convertible foreign exchange. It also deemed the Cenvat credit on the disputed input services admissible and found the classification dispute unwarranted. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>