<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267133</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses incurred while providing consulting engineer services was unsustainable based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Delhi. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267133</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses incurred while providing consulting engineer services was unsustainable based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Delhi. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>