<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2405 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267131</link>
    <description>The court held that the sale of levy rice by the petitioners to FCI at Kakinada constitutes an inter-state sale under Section 3(a) of the CST Act. As a result, the assessment orders imposing VAT under the AP VAT Act were deemed to lack jurisdiction and were set aside. The court further clarified that this ruling does not prevent FCI from reclaiming the excess payment made to the petitioners as the VAT component.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2405 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267131</link>
      <description>The court held that the sale of levy rice by the petitioners to FCI at Kakinada constitutes an inter-state sale under Section 3(a) of the CST Act. As a result, the assessment orders imposing VAT under the AP VAT Act were deemed to lack jurisdiction and were set aside. The court further clarified that this ruling does not prevent FCI from reclaiming the excess payment made to the petitioners as the VAT component.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>