<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2400 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals as all demands were beyond the normal limitation period. It kept the issue of whether the activity amounted to manufacture open, as the adjudicating authority had not provided a clear decision on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2400 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals as all demands were beyond the normal limitation period. It kept the issue of whether the activity amounted to manufacture open, as the adjudicating authority had not provided a clear decision on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>