<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2385 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267111</link>
    <description>The respondent-assessee was successful in the case regarding entitlement to carry forward and set-off of business losses under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that control through a subsidiary maintained the required voting power above 51%, satisfying the provisions of Section 79. Additionally, the assessee was granted the entitlement to claim deduction under Section 35AB for the payment of Rs. 5 Crores for technical know-how, as the liability to pay arose on the date of transfer, irrespective of the deferred payment schedule. The appeals were dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2385 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267111</link>
      <description>The respondent-assessee was successful in the case regarding entitlement to carry forward and set-off of business losses under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that control through a subsidiary maintained the required voting power above 51%, satisfying the provisions of Section 79. Additionally, the assessee was granted the entitlement to claim deduction under Section 35AB for the payment of Rs. 5 Crores for technical know-how, as the liability to pay arose on the date of transfer, irrespective of the deferred payment schedule. The appeals were dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>