<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267110</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals and set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of deductions under Section 80IB (10) (a) due to non-compliance with obtaining a completion certificate before the stipulated date. The court determined that the amended provision of Section 80IB (10) (a) is prospective and mandatory, applying uniformly to all assessees, regardless of the accounting method followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267110</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals and set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of deductions under Section 80IB (10) (a) due to non-compliance with obtaining a completion certificate before the stipulated date. The court determined that the amended provision of Section 80IB (10) (a) is prospective and mandatory, applying uniformly to all assessees, regardless of the accounting method followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>