<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 56 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the alleged mis-declaration of Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) and duty payment discrepancies. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of &quot;foreign going aircraft&quot; and the applicability of concessional duty rates to domestic extension flights. The Tribunal held that the flights in question qualified as foreign going aircraft under the Customs Act, 1962, entitling them to fuel supply at a concessional rate of duty. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief based on legal interpretations and precedent cases cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 56 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the alleged mis-declaration of Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) and duty payment discrepancies. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of &quot;foreign going aircraft&quot; and the applicability of concessional duty rates to domestic extension flights. The Tribunal held that the flights in question qualified as foreign going aircraft under the Customs Act, 1962, entitling them to fuel supply at a concessional rate of duty. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief based on legal interpretations and precedent cases cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>