<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2372 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues. Regarding the deduction of discount on debentures, it confirmed that the discount should be spread over the debentures&#039; period, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent. Concerning the premium on unsecured loans, it agreed that the premium constituted interest and was subject to tax deduction at source, affirming the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2372 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues. Regarding the deduction of discount on debentures, it confirmed that the discount should be spread over the debentures&#039; period, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent. Concerning the premium on unsecured loans, it agreed that the premium constituted interest and was subject to tax deduction at source, affirming the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>