https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174949 A finding of wilful adulteration under Rule 300 could not rest on the mere presence of deteriorated liquor in the premises without evidence linking the licensee to the act. The authorities also could not rely on alleged tampering signs that were not part of the original inspection material, because new adverse material must be disclosed and met before it is used against a party. On that basis, the cancellation and appellate orders were unsustainable, and the proceedings were vitiated by an erroneous presumption, lack of supporting evidence, and breach of natural justice. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:39:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174949 A finding of wilful adulteration under Rule 300 could not rest on the mere presence of deteriorated liquor in the premises without evidence linking the licensee to the act. The authorities also could not rely on alleged tampering signs that were not part of the original inspection material, because new adverse material must be disclosed and met before it is used against a party. On that basis, the cancellation and appellate orders were unsustainable, and the proceedings were vitiated by an erroneous presumption, lack of supporting evidence, and breach of natural justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174949