<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>WHETHER CABLE UNDER CHAPTER 85 IS ACCEPTED AS CAPITAL GOODS BY CE DEPARTMENT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109348</link>
    <description>The dispute concerns whether cables under chapter 85 (heading 8544) qualify as Capital Goods for procurement under SHIS/Notification No.33/2012-CE. The forum majority contends that cables integral to a factory power installation (33 KVA station) fall within Rule 2(a) CCR, 2004 and the inclusive Explanation to the notification and are thus eligible, subject to SHIS conditions. A cited CESTAT decision denies SHIS for accessories not tied to the FTP specified sector, underscoring the need to establish sectoral nexus, actual user condition and the scheme&#039;s object; written departmental denial, appeals and litigation are suggested remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:20:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>WHETHER CABLE UNDER CHAPTER 85 IS ACCEPTED AS CAPITAL GOODS BY CE DEPARTMENT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109348</link>
      <description>The dispute concerns whether cables under chapter 85 (heading 8544) qualify as Capital Goods for procurement under SHIS/Notification No.33/2012-CE. The forum majority contends that cables integral to a factory power installation (33 KVA station) fall within Rule 2(a) CCR, 2004 and the inclusive Explanation to the notification and are thus eligible, subject to SHIS conditions. A cited CESTAT decision denies SHIS for accessories not tied to the FTP specified sector, underscoring the need to establish sectoral nexus, actual user condition and the scheme&#039;s object; written departmental denial, appeals and litigation are suggested remedies.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:20:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>